PORTSMOUTHPOINT

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, October 14, 2012

Aesthetics Are A Moral Imperative

Posted on 12:44 AM by Unknown
by Robert Bendell

(source:historicalwallpapers.blogspot.com)
Oscar Wilde took a trip around America in 1882 lecturing on his own belief in aestheticism. It must be remembered that this was after the Civil War, that first great failure of American ideals. Citizens throughout America had been shocked by the violence that led on from the noble ideals upon which they had fought for independence. For this reason, one observer asked Oscar Wilde what he thought it was about America that made Americans violent; Wilde’s now-famous response was that the true cause was how terrible the wallpaper was in their nation.
At first glance, this appears to be a remark that, while controversial, is essentially unimportant. However, Oscar Wilde held his belief in aestheticism --- that the highest ideal is the creation of aesthetically pleasing objects and ideas --- very strongly. While I do not agree that this is the highest ideal, I do think that it is among the highest moral imperatives.
Before continuing to argue whether or not aesthetics are a moral imperative, we must first define morality. For the purpose of this argument, I will use the Utilitarian definition of morality being whatever causes the most happiness and the least unhappiness. I use this for three reasons; firstly, because it is the most commonly used justification for morality in modern times, secondly because it is my own definition and thirdly because a discussion of the nature of morality would take far more than one article.
The majority of moral actions that can be easily thought of and defended --- giving to charity, curing cancer and protecting the helpless --- are methods of preventing unhappiness. However, creating happiness is more difficult and uncertain. There are a few methods of doing this. Personally, I feel that the best and simplest method is love --- however, as well as being the simplest, it is also the most difficult. For this reason, it cannot be a moral imperative, since an imperative must be achievable.
Another might be to cause pleasure through consumption of objects. Eating delicious food and drinking alcohol might cause pleasure for many people, and this pleasure would in most cases lead to happiness, at least temporarily. However, the problem with consumption as a method of ensuring happiness is that, inevitably, whatever is being consumed is being used up and therefore cannot be permanent. Another problem is that consumption automatically decreases the amount of whatever is being consumed and therefore means that there is less available to other people, which leads to a feeling of immorality or selfishness and therefore unhappiness.
The only method of bringing about lasting pleasure, without consuming or using anything, is if one gains pleasure merely from observing it --- that is, if the pleasure one gains from it is aesthetic. Therefore, the creation of something that is aesthetically pleasing leads to greater, more reliable happiness than any other form of pleasure --- except mutual love. However, as mentioned earlier, love cannot be ensured, and is as often destructive as it is helpful.
Aesthetic?
(source: gallerycache.com)
One counter-argument that could be raised would be that aesthetics also cannot be ensured. However, there is general agreement about what is aesthetic (the Mona Lisa) and what is not (John Major), while love varies enormously from case to case.
Not aesthetic?
(source: heraldsun)
Another advantage to aesthetics is that they are less uncertain than other forms of morality. It is often extremely difficult to say whether an action is moral or not, while it is relatively easy to say whether it is beautiful or not.
In all, while there are other aspects of morality --- not inflicting pain, ensuring that basic needs are met, etc. --- that are equally important, the importance of aesthetics cannot be denied. On the other hand, perfectionism and the refusal to accept the aesthetics of things as they are is at least as destructive as moral perfectionism, and the refusal to accept immorality in any situation. As in almost all debates, some balance must be found; however, if you can make your life more beautiful in any way with no moral cost, there is no reason it should not be permitted.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Art and Literature, Blog Exclusive, Philosophy and Religion | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Recipe: Fifteens
     by Patrick McGuiggan The definitive Northern Ireland traybake is the ‘Fifteen’. They are so delicious I assumed that they would be fairly ...
  • 'Porphyria's Lover': A Feminist Reading
    Josh Rampton offers a Feminist reading of Robert Browning's poem 'Porphyria's Lover'. This article was originally published ...
  • Favourite Films: Skyfall
    by Tom Harper Upon my recent exploration of the latest movie archives I was stopped dead in my tracks by Disney and Pixar’s recent announcem...
  • Interview: with Melissa Smith of ‘The Exonerated’
    by Taylor Richardson Melissa Smith , who plays a main role in the school’s production of The Exonerated , answers five questions surroundi...
  • Why Are We So Fascinated By The Gothic?
    Lucy Cole The Nightmare by John Henry Fuseli, 1781 (wiki commons) Since its humble beginnings in 1764, with Horace Walpole’s The Castle of O...
  • Portsmouth Point Poetry – War and Humanity in 'The Iliad'
    by George Laver  Priam (left) pleads with Achilles (centre) for the return of the body of his son, Hector (below). (source: bc.edu)    ...
  • Is Lack of Sleep a Problem for PGS Pupils?
    by Hattie Gould and Annie Materna (image source: uratexblog.com) Sleep deprivation is a continual problem for teenagers and can be the caus...
  • Why The US Supreme Court Has Made The Right Decision Regarding Gene Patenting
    by Tim Bustin (source: biopoliticaltimes.org) On Thursday, the US Supreme Court ruled that human genes may not be patented, as “a naturally ...
  • Is Conscience Innate or Learned?
    by Oliver Price (source: adorotedevote.blogspot.com) Developmental pyschologist Jean Piaget put forward the theory that conscience is learne...
  • Doctor Who Series 7: Massive Disappointment
    by Melissa Smith Nice fez (image source: doctorwhotv.co.uk) I’d like to start off with a disclaimer: I have been an avid fan of Doctor Who ...

Categories

  • Art and Literature (72)
  • Blog Exclusive (466)
  • Creative Writing (36)
  • Current Affairs (55)
  • Economics (12)
  • Film and Drama (62)
  • Food (12)
  • From Parents (1)
  • From Teachers (54)
  • Hackers (12)
  • History (21)
  • Language (17)
  • MUN (1)
  • Music (58)
  • Personal (45)
  • Philosophy and Religion (20)
  • Photography (66)
  • Psychology (13)
  • Science and Tech (41)
  • Sport (58)
  • Travel (14)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (346)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (43)
    • ►  June (52)
    • ►  May (42)
    • ►  April (41)
    • ►  March (42)
    • ►  February (38)
    • ►  January (47)
  • ▼  2012 (153)
    • ►  December (41)
    • ►  November (48)
    • ▼  October (45)
      • The True Public Health Crisis of the 21st Century
      • Review: A Broken Rose
      • Is God responsible for everything that happens in ...
      • Review: Skyfall
      • Misunderstood Movie Villains
      • How Effective Is Our Prison System?
      • A Slice of Enlightenment – answering some of the g...
      • The 'Ginger' Issue
      • How Do You Solve a Problem Like the Euro?
      • Best and Worst Teams of the Week
      • Kick Racism Out Of Football!
      • Review: Looper
      • Review: Allelujah! Don’t Bend! Ascend! By Godspeed...
      • A Nation Mourns, But Comes of Age
      • ‘Anna Karenina’: A Review
      • President of the Internet?
      • Man Booker Prize Winner 2012: Bring Up The Bodies
      • Review: Green Day - ¡Uno!
      • 21 Things you Couldn’t Do Before You Turned Sixteen
      • Photography Club: The Eye
      • Aesthetics Are A Moral Imperative
      • Hackers: Forest of Light and Dark
      • On The Road
      • US 2012: The Latin American Dream
      • Out of the void . . . and then?
      • 'How Is There Something Rather Than Nothing?'
      • A Universe From Nothing
      • Great Gatsby: The Movie
      • Best and Worst Bond Films
      • Two Reviews of Adele's Skyfall.
      • All About Me!
      • Why The Nobel Prize System Needs To Change
      • Premier League: Best and Worst Teams of the Week
      • ICC WORLD T20: A Memorable Finish
      • Ryder Cup 2012: Greatest Comeback in Golfing History
      • Double Delight for Heroic Hampshire: Season Review...
      • In Defence of Eric Hobsbawm
      • In Memory of Amália Rodrigues: The Queen of Fado
      • With the Beatles in Portsmouth
      • US Election: How Much Is Too Much?
      • Five Reasons To Treasure The Portmuthian
      • Muse: The 2nd Law – Magnificence or Madness?
      • Portsmouth Point Poetry: Field of Autumn
      • Shakespeare: Modern Art
      • Review: Tempest by Bob Dylan
    • ►  September (19)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile